Perhaps in a perfect world we would enact perfect laws, perfectly charged & perfectly prosecuted, perfectly defended & perfectly adjudicated before perfectly reasonable jurors, with perfectly impartial application to perfectly sinister criminals, in an effort to perfectly dissuade perfectly logical otherwise-criminals in a perfectly logical world.
Instead, we hide quasi-professionals behind closed-doors and away from prying eyes, to murder our fellow citizens in a disturbing effort to satiate our blood-lust for revenge. We support and defend a barbaric policy which not only wrongly murders innocent people, but does so in an extremely racist manner. Perhaps some (only some) of this could conceivably be overlooked, if in fact capital punishment could be shown to be an effective form of dissuasion. If.
And the idea which makes the least bit of sense is the idea that we can teach people not to kill people – by killing people! Do not as I do, but as I say...
Ah yes, reason.
“…He who is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone.” -John 8:7
“Judge not, that you not be judged. For with what judgment you judge, you will also be judged; and with the same measure you use, it will be measured back to you.” -Matthew 7:1-3
“But if you do not forgive men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.” -Matthew 6:15
“Therefore, whatever you want men to do to you, do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets.” -Matthew 7:12
“If someone slaps you on one cheek, turn to them the other also. If someone takes your coat, do not withhold your shirt from them.” –Luke 6:29
And He said, “Woe to you also, you lawyers! For you load men with burdens hard to bear, and you yourselves do not touch the burdens with one of your fingers.” -Luke 11:46
“But go and learn what this means: I desire mercy and not sacrifice…” -Matthew 9:13
“These people draw near to Me with their mouth, And honor Me with their lips, But their heart is far from Me. And in vain they worship Me, Teaching as doctrine the commandments of men.” -Matthew 15:8,9
The cost of prosecuting a capital punishment case versus a ‘life’ case is a difference of $90,000 per inmate, per year of incarceration.
Another way to think about this – US life expectancy is 78 years*, if a defendant is 18, then it costs $90k x 60 years = $5,400,000 more to kill a fellow US citizen than to keep them alive and in prison.
(*US average. Men live shorter lives than women, black men live shorter lives than white, and I would venture to guess that folks in prison have shorter overall life expectancies – but you get the point.)
And if you want to talk hypocrisy, those small-government folks take the cake. They want a government so small that it murders it’s own citizens. On purpose. Libertarians cannot be pro-capital punishment.
To those spineless abhorrents who think they have to balance their beliefs that women can control their own bodies, and that equality means for gay people, too – by being tough on crime.
It doesn’t work. If you learn one thing from Obama, it’s that they don’t like you. Doesn’t matter how tough you are on crime, how hawkish you are with Iran, how much you talk national security and counter-terrorism, how much you thump your bible or clutch your rifle – they don’t like you.
They won’t cooperate. They think effective government hurts their brand, they will not play nice, even when they agree on policy. Divided gov’t is broken gov’t, you have to win control. You win moderates by being more reasonable and making better (populist) arguments. By showing the contrast, not by going juuuust to the left of your opponent.
Make no mistake (and it’s certainly no mistake) – the justice system is anything but.
Private prisons use their profits to (legally) bribe politicians who pass laws that keep those private prisons profitable, by filling them with non-violent drug offenders and guaranteeing a minimum number of beds-filled (or else the tax-payers reimburse the private prison).
Blacks are more likely to be (aggressively) charged for crimes with (racist) mandatory-minimums. While using/manufacturing/selling drugs at roughly the same rates, blacks are far more likely to be convicted for drug crimes. Blacks and Latinos consist the vast majority of death row inmates while consisting of less than half the population. As with the bible verses, I could go on…
When we murder someone (yes murder, it’s premeditated), we can’t take that back. We have tens of thousands of DNA tests waiting to be done, and innocent people are rotting in prison for it. A recent study showed that 1 in 25 death row inmates were innocent! That is collateral damage that none of us should be comfortable with.
Once in prison, we throw people in solitary for decades at a time, or leave them in a prison gang and rape culture that only makes matters worse. What happened to rehabilitation? Isn’t that why we called them penitentiaries in the first place?
Hippocratic oath. First, do no harm. Luckily, every major medical association refuses to allow members to participate in a state-sanctioned murder. Unfortunately, this means that barely-trained volunteers are tasked with carrying out the premeditated killing. (Hence the mishap in Missouri a while back, where they went straight through the vein and as result the drugs were absorbed into the muscle tissue rather than into the blood stream and thus their intended destination.)
Kudos medical professionals. Huzzah. And boo to those vile volunteer cads carrying out the evil deed.
Profits. Pharmaceutical companies are (at least 50%) publicly traded, which means that fiduciary responsibility to share-holders takes precedent. In this particular case, we have a positive side effect to an injurious disease.
When you sell pharmaceuticals, it is very bad marketing if your company is associated with death. More specifically, you don’t want your brand of anesthetic known for killing people. Too easy.
Compounding companies on the other hand?
Red states are turning to compounding pharmacies for single-use batches with exactly zero FDA oversight/approval and no assurance of ‘cruel and unusual’ compliance.
The SCOTUS has approved lethal injection under the 8th Amendment only under specific conditions, including the specific drugs to be used and specific injection-sites on the body.
We are now passing laws in states that not only hide the identities of the folks performing the executions, and laws hiding the producers of the drugs, but laws even hiding which drugs are being used to murder our people – clearly at odds with SCOTUS.
We also have states (FL) trying to expedite the process so innocent death-row inmates have minimal for appeal.
If we’re going to make such a fuss over how we kill people, if we are going to eschew the 8th Amendment…
We could do it in four weekly installments. The initial sentencing phase would handle people convicted of crimes carrying possible life-sentences. Produce short videos on the cases; was the crime especially gory, is anyone involved pretty? We bet on the sentences. Tons of gambling revenue for the state. Put it on C-SPAN and rake in ad revenue.
Week two, we broadcast the sentencing. Judges would rise to Simon Cowell-levels of fame. Judge Judys handing out death sentences. Gold! Networks would pay a pretty penny to carry the show. Sure, sentencing guidelines would be thrown into chaos – but we’re talking about criminals here, am I right?
In phase three, those sentenced to death step up and spin – the Wheel of Death! Guillotine? Lions? Firing squad? Disemboweling? Crucifixion? Burning at the stake? Drowning? The chair? Not only would it be ratings gold, this allows for all the more wagering!
And of course, the main show. Pay-per-view. How much would people pay to watch an execution compared to a fight or a concert? Just think of all of the tax-breaks we could give to billionaires!
Real clear site, appreciate it for this post.